Red Angus AssnMiller BrangusSilveus Ins_4-21-09
Advertise With Us Subscribe Today Facebook
SouthernLivestock.com
Not a member? Membership has its privileges— Register today! • Make SLS your homepage!
Cattle & Services Directory
House Ad_#3_Classified boxWeather_4-15-10Simbrah Synergy_8-27-10
Salacoa Valley_9-1-10Don Thomas_8-23-10
Note: login or register to personalize
Submit Recipes to the Editor
home articles Marketing | Email to a Friend

Study Shows Buying Local Doesn’t Necessarily Save Fuel

published: July 22nd 2010
by: Rachel Hutton
source: Citypages.com

Do you know where your meat is from? Is local always better? Not necessarily in terms of transportation fuel use, a recent USDA report determined. The details of the report, recently produced by several economists and academics, including a few contributors from the University of Minnesota, makes a distinction between between the idea of total food miles and the amount of transportation fuel burned per pound of food.

The researchers wanted to understand issues related to scaling up local food access. The Minnesota component of the study compared the beef supply chains for Kowalski's on Grand Avenue in St. Paul, SunShineHarvest Farm (a Minneapolis farmers' markets vendor), and Thousand Hills Cattle Co., a regional purveyor that sells to supermarkets, restaurants, and institutions.

The study determined that Kowaksi's beef--originating in Montana, slaughtered in Kansas, then sent to its distribution center in St. Michael, Minnesota--traveled about 1,645 food miles from farm to market. Beef from SunShineHarvest, a farm near Northfield, which slaughters its cattle in New Prague, Minnesota, traveled about 75 food miles. But here's the crux:

 But wait. SunShineHarvest is driving a pickup truck that carries three animals at a time. In the Kowalski supply chain, semi-trailers are hauling 40 to 55 cattle at a time and then 45,000 pounds of fresh meat.

 The result, the study concludes, is that the direct sales chain uses 2.18 gallons of fuel to get 100 pounds of meat to market. The traditional mainstream supply chain uses less, an average of 1.92 gallons per 100 pounds of meat.

The researchers found that an intermediate-size, regional supply chain like that of Thousand Hills (buying from regional farmers, processing animals in Cannon Falls, and selling meat regionally), provided the lowest ratio of 0.69 gallons per 100 pounds of meat. The researchers were hesitant to draw larger conclusions without further study, but it's certainly something to consider next time you shop.

Site:   Home   Publications   Market Reports   Sale Reports   Sale Calendar   Classifieds   Cattle & Service Directory   Full Commodities Report   Services   About Us   Contact Us

Article Categories:   All   Industry News   Herd Health   Feed & Nutrition   Pastures & Forages   Reproduction   Marketing   Columnists   Production   Genetics & Performance   Weather Forecast   Breed News   Producer Feature Stories   Items of Interest   New Products   Recipes

User:   Login   Logout   Register/Profile   Submit Market Report   Submit Sale Report